Comments for Cascadia Times

Comment on Adding Fluoride to Portland Drinking Water? Really? by R. Seydel

R. Seydel — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:35:03 +0000

Fluoride is made from aluminum tailings and causes tooth enamel to become brittle after prolonged utilization. I have lost the report I read and wished I could find it again in my files. I can’t help but think that there is $pecial interest brain washing going on. They are going to jam it down are throats, like it or not. Parents need to eliminate sugar intake by their kids and avoid fluoride.

Comment on Fukushima, South Carolina. The nuke below the failing dam by financial help

financial help — Mon, 20 May 2013 17:22:59 +0000

Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out much.
I hope to give something back and help others like you
aided me.

Comment on Fukushima, South Carolina. The nuke below the failing dam by pregnancy planning

pregnancy planning — Fri, 17 May 2013 08:15:25 +0000

Hello this is kind of of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML.
I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Comment on Adding Fluoride to Portland Drinking Water? Really? by Brian Setzler

Brian Setzler — Wed, 15 May 2013 14:22:27 +0000

Here is the link to the National Academy of Sciences Report on Fluoride (Mentioned above).

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11571&page=1):

Just change the “1” to the page number noted above and it will take you to the quote so you can read the science yourself.

Comment on Adding Fluoride to Portland Drinking Water? Really? by Brian Setzler

Brian Setzler — Wed, 15 May 2013 14:20:46 +0000

Does this sound 100% safe?

The National Academy of Science’s 2006 report Fluoride in Drinking Water is considered the most comprehensive, authoritative resource ever written on the toxicity of fluoride.

This 507-page volume, which took three years to complete, was researched and compiled by a blue– ribbon committee of 12 leading scientists. It thoroughly documents harm from fluoride exposure and cites numerous ways Americans could suffer adverse effects. Selected quotes from their report

(http://www.nap.edu/openbook.ph… (Just change the last digit here to the page number below and it will take you right to the selected quotes so you can read them in context.

Brain: “… it is apparent that fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain and the body by direct and indirect means .…” p. 222

Cancer: “… osteosarcoma (bone cancer) is of particular concern as a potential effect of fluoride …” p. 336 (NOTE: The Bassin/Harvard study published a few months after the NAS report found a 500% increase in bone cancer in boys exposed to fluoride in drinking water — Cancer Causes Control, 2006)

Diabetes: “… sufficient fluoride exposure appears to bring about increases in blood glucose or impaired glucose intolerance in some individuals and to increase the severity of some types of diabetes.” p. 260

Endocrine system: “Fluoride is therefore an endocrine disruptor in the broad sense of altering normal endocrine function …” p. 266

Kidney Disease: “Portions of the renal system may therefore be at higher risk of fluoride toxicity than most soft tissues .… The effect of low doses of fluoride on kidney … functions in humans needs to be carefully documented .…” p. 303

Thyroid Disease: “The chief endocrine effects of fluoride exposures in experimental animals and in humans include decreased thyroid function . . “ p. 8 (NOTE: Over 4% of Americans have hypothyroidism (low thyroid function). Fluoride alone could put 41,000 people at risk who drink Portland’s water.

Comment on Adding Fluoride to Portland Drinking Water? Really? by Alexander Baretich

Alexander Baretich — Wed, 15 May 2013 10:35:37 +0000

Thank you.

Free Cascadia! Free from human domination and human exploitation!

Comment on Adding Fluoride to Portland Drinking Water? Really? by Lianagan

Lianagan — Wed, 15 May 2013 06:57:10 +0000

This pretty much sums it up:

Comment on Adding Fluoride to Portland Drinking Water? Really? by Rae N

Rae N — Tue, 14 May 2013 22:45:45 +0000

The “local” waves of support are not really local.

Comment on New Film “Pandora’s Promise” Likely to Unleash Nuclear Energy Revivalists by Skotty

Skotty — Sat, 11 May 2013 05:07:38 +0000

The statement “Germany exceeded 50% solar in November” should be clarified. This in no way means they get 50% of their power from Solar, on average. It means, on one particular high production low consumption day, it briefly hit 50%. The long term average, however, is closer to 5%. While impressive, it also highlights the extreme variability of such renewables.

Comment on From the Pacific Northwest to Fukushima: the long, tragic trail of failed General Electric Nuclear Plants by Officer Serpico

Officer Serpico — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:02:31 +0000

Thomas Carter, owner of THE PRISM NUCLEAR GROUP Inc.:

http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/tom-carter/35/2a9/79a